|
NEWSLETTER: DECEMBER 2005
(See Past Issues: Archives)
(To SUBSCRIBE,
Click Here)
Hello. Welcome to the DECEMBER 2005 edition of our
Disability Network Newsletter - current employment
issues and resources for people with disabilities and
the organizations that support them.
(We do our best to provide accurate and current
information; but please check with the sources for
validation of the information we have provided.)
PLEASE FORWARD THIS NEWSLETTER TO INTERESTED FRIENDS
AND ASSOCIATES. IF THIS WAS FORWARDED TO YOU AND YOU
WANT TO SUBSCRIBE TO FUTURE ISSUES, PLEASE SEE THE "TO
SUBSCRIBE" LINK AT THE BOTTOM.
|
In this final issue of 2005, I have chosen to include an
article on “Customized Employment”. This article will
primarily be of interest to readers who are personally or
professionally engaged in the lives of people with
developmental disabilities. Customized Employment is gaining
momentum as a new approach to the employment needs of folks
with developmental disabilities.
For years, my partner Denise Bissonnette has been
asserting that employment initiatives for anyone should
begin with that individual’s unique interests and gifts –
and her work has been warmly received by folks working in
the arena of developmental disabilities. This understanding
seems to be at the heart of Customized Employment.
Perspective is everything. In current-day North American
society, the predominant view of the “labor market” is that
it is a rather rigid inventory of variously-shaped holes
into which a job seeker must be made to fit (the holes with
the most likely vacancy rates being the preferred goal). As
we have honed the craft of making people “fit” into
available holes, we have committed what Denise refers to as
“vocational violence” on countless job seekers. Another,
equally valid perspective on the labor market is that it is
more a multifaceted and organic field of opportunity into
which a job seeker can find or create a niche for the work
that they love and want to do. It is in these niches that
notions of “job satisfaction” “meaningful work” seem to
blossom most profusely.
My thanks to all of you who, in 2005, have taken the time
to read this newsletter, share it with friends, send us
words of encouragement, provided topical feedback and/or
contributed articles. As we enter 2006, may we all
experience the joy of a vibrantly-blossoming niche.
~ Rob McInnes
Read Previous Issues of our Newsletter...
|
|
~ By Cary Griffith, Dave Hammis & Tammara Geary
Customized Employment (CE) is being demonstrated in
communities across the nation and numerous questions and
concerns are being raised as this advanced employment
strategy expands. The U.S. Department of Labor, Office of
Disability and Employment Policy (ODEP) explains that:
“Customized employment means individualizing the
employment relationship between employees and employers in
ways that meet the needs of both. It is based on an
individualized determination of the strengths, needs, and
interests of the person with a disability, and is also
designed to meet the specific needs of the employer.
It may include employment developed through job carving,
self-employment or entrepreneurial initiatives, or other job
development or restructuring strategies that result in job
responsibilities being customized and individually
negotiated to fit the needs of individuals with a
disability.
Customized employment assumes the provision of reasonable
accommodations and supports necessary for the individual to
perform the functions of a job that is individually
negotiated and developed.” (Federal Register, June 26, 2002,
Vol. 67. No. 123 pp 43154 -43149).
The principal hallmarks and activities of CE include: •
Identifying specific job duties or employer expectations
that are negotiated with employers; • Targeting
individualized job goals to negotiate based on the needs,
strengths, and interests of the employment seeker; • Meeting
the unique needs of the employment seeker and the discrete,
emerging needs of the employer; • Starting with the
individual as the source of information for exploring
potential employment options; • Offering representation, as
needed, for employment seekers to assist in negotiating with
employers; • Occurring in integrated, non-congregate
environments in the community or in a business alongside
people who do not have disabilities; • Resulting in pay at
at least the prevailing wage (no sub-minimum wages); •
Creating employment through self-employment and business
ownership; • Facilitating an amalgam of supports and funding
sources that may include Workforce Investment
(One-Stops/Career Centers), Vocational Rehabilitation (VR),
Medicaid, Community Rehabilitation Programs (CRPs), Schools,
Social Security (SSA), families, and other partners
coordinated in ways to meet the needs of the individual
(Griffin & Hammis, 2005; Callahan, 2005; Condon, 2004)
Making Customized Employment work raises numerous
questions, both unique and anticipated. The following is a
sampling of the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about CE,
and some brief responses:
|
|
Mike Callahan of Employment for All suggests that CE
“stands on the shoulders of supported employment.” The job
search process using a supported employment model is largely
driven by what jobs are available, advertised, or easy to
find in that community or region. A heavy reliance on a
Labor Market approach impacts the kinds of jobs sought for
people with disabilities, hence the high proportion of food
service, custodial, and high turnover jobs.
CE is a refinement of supported employment, but varies in
important ways. In CE, the first step is getting to know the
employment seeker without preconceived ideas of “appropriate
work” or what is advertised or is typically available in the
local job market. Once the person is known, then work can be
explored based on the person’s interests, skills, and
strengths. In other words, employment situations are sought
that meet the needs of the individual, and a negotiation
follows that melds the desires of the worker while
simultaneously meeting the needs of the employer. CE
counteracts the approach of filling available jobs and
instead uses Discovery of the individual as the driving
force in a job creation process, and seeks to create
mutually beneficial employment relationships.
Supported Employment makes allowances for congregate or
group settings such as Mobile Crews and Enclaves, where
sub-minimum wages may be paid. CE is specifically
individualized and accepts commensurate wages only, in
integrated settings. CE also includes business ownership as
an important employment option (Griffin & Hammis, 2003).
|
|
The most widely used process is called Discovery
(Callahan, 2004; Condon, 2004; Griffin, Hammis, & Geary,
2005). Discovery is not planning, it is an assessment
process that seeks to answer the questions “who is this
person?” and “what are the ideal conditions of employment?”
The process most often starts at home, includes an inventory
of the surrounding neighborhood (with transportation and
natural supports an on-going employment and inclusion issue,
it makes sense to look for interests, and subsequently,
opportunities nearby), and expands to places where interests
can be explored through informational interviews, paid work
experiences, or engagement in social activities. One vital
point to remember during Discovery is that the CE team,
employment specialist, employment seeker, family member and
whoever else is involved, is not looking for employment; the
outcome should be a reflection of the complexity of all
human lives. In other words, there should be multiple
employment directions revealed, not a job description, but
rather vocational interests and a revealing of skills that
are used to create employment in the community. For a more
detailed discussion of Discovery visit
http://ruralinstitute.umt.edu/transition and
http://www.employmentforall.org
|
|
Standardized vocational evaluation has never been proven
to predict employment success. Discovery replaces the
predictive validity assertion of Voc Eval with the
ecologically valid process of witnessing an individual’s
needs, skills, desires, interests, and contributions in real
community environments. This approach is much more
functional and therefore more cost effective than
traditional approaches to assessment, which often screen
people out of employment services instead of capturing their
potential as workers and human beings.
|
|
CE is too new to have generated any definitive cost data.
The question is a good one, but might be further refined by
asking “too expensive for whom?” Approximately 74% of adults
with developmental disabilities remain unemployed, served
largely in sheltered work or non-work day programs operated
across the country (Metzel, et al. in press). The
unemployment rate for individuals with psychiatric
disabilities is worse and estimated at close to 90%, even
though individuals with psychiatric disabilities list their
greatest need and desire as being employed (Drake, 2005;
Bond, 1992). The tremendous expense of building over 5,000
day programs, segregated transportation systems, and
associated services has not delivered gainful employment,
adequate training for employment, or social inclusion. CE
can be accomplished for those needing such an intensive
approach by blending day program funding, VR and WIA
supports, and/or SSA Work Incentives such as Plans for
Achieving Self Support (PASS), and Medicaid. Examples to
date do not reveal extraordinary costs at all. In fact, it
can be effectively demonstrated that using one year’s
typical day program funding can easily fund wage employment
or business ownership for an individual with significant
disabilities (Griffin, Brooks-Lane, Hammis & Crandell, in
press).
For instance, the national average day program rate is
approximately $12,000. The average cost of a Supported
Employment placement for Vocational Rehabilitation is just
under $5000. Using the entire $12,000, just from day
program, can likely cover the costs of Discovery, job
development or small business start-up, and coaching. Even
using a couple thousand dollars a year for on-going supports
(i.e., Extended Employment), the cost of employment is
significantly less. For example, an individual enters a day
program at a cost of $12,000 per year. Outcomes data
suggests this person will likely be there for 30 years or
more. Assuming no increases in funding (highly unlikely),
the taxpayer bill for this program is $360,000, plus SSI
payments in excess of $208,440 (again assuming no increases
and not including the cost of Medicaid). Using the CE
approach, the cost scenario might be as much as $12,000 for
employment development services, plus $2,000 a year in
additional vocational supports, or $70,000 over 30 years
(these expenses will no doubt vary based on the complexity
of support needs, competence of the trainers, and job match
precision). At earnings of just $6.00 per hour for 30 hours
per week (the typical weekly enrollment hours for a day
program), this person would be expected to earn $9,360 per
year, or $280,800 over the next 30 years, plus
conservatively figured, Social Security savings of over
$100,000. Even assuming the person changes jobs 3 or 4
times, CE is still less expensive.
|
|
People with disabilities, just like everyone else, live
complex lives. The more exposure we have to ideas, diverse
environments, people, and activities, the more interests we
develop. Believing that any one of us has only one dream job
is quite limiting when careers are considered. We once
worked with a young man and asked a question we should no
longer be asking: “Tell us Bill, what’s your dream job?” He
told us that he wanted to rewind videotapes at Blockbuster.
That seems like a very limiting position; one that is likely
isolated from other workers, is repetitious and boring, and
which holds little potential for natural support development
or career and skill advancement. In truth, this “Dream Job”
was the result of the Job Developer asking this question of
someone with limited life experiences (other than weekly
outings to the movie theater), and it reflected the teaching
skills of the agency’s personnel who could help someone
master video rewinding but few tasks of more complexity.
Following the Discovery process Bill revealed that he really
aspired to be a movie director, and this opened up
discussions about entertainment, acting, theatrical
production, etc. Now there were many jobs open to Bill for
exploration. Focusing in on a dream job is too limiting. CE
reveals themes in people’s lives and is open to combinations
of interests resulting in new and diverse career directions
(Griffin, Brooks-Lane, Hammis & Crandell, in press).
|
|
CE can be appropriate for anyone living a complex life
and not just individuals with significant disabilities. In
this instance, we are considering people with significant
disabilities. Both WIA and VR programs are vital partners in
creating wage employment and/or small business ownership.
Both systems can individually and collaboratively “braid” or
amalgamate funding with other systems (CRPs or school
transition programs, for instance). As an example, one young
man with a diagnosis of autism needed funds for a small
business start-up, as well as on-going support to make
deliveries across town. The CRP funded an employment
specialist to do the driving several hours a day for the
first year, until the young business owner could afford to
hire his own employee to do the driving; VR purchased auto
repairs for a vehicle donated by his family; and WIA, under
a CE demonstration project, purchased several thousand
dollars in production equipment. In other cases, a Plan for
Achieving Self Support (PASS) can also be used in
combination with VR, CRP, and WIA funds to purchase
equipment, put cash into a small business, pay for various
supports, and also to assist with the identification and
maintenance of a wage job (Griffin, Brooks-Lane, Hammis &
Crandell, in press).
|
|
Over the past five years there has been a net loss of
jobs in the United States. The unemployment rate for people
with disabilities, however, remains unchanged from the 1990s
when this country created over 22,000,0000 new jobs. The
labor market has almost zero impact on the employment rate
of people with significant disabilities. What does have an
impact is the will of leadership at all levels to make
employment a priority. The money exists, the technology and
techniques exist, and the employment opportunities exist.
CE is significantly different from competitive employment
in that while competitive employment has been brutal to
people with disabilities, CE recognizes that employers are
always hiring. That is, there is always room in a company
for people who match the culture and values of the company,
who can perform work of value to the company, and who
perform work that is valued by the customer who then
purchases the fruits of the labor thereby creating and
maintaining the employment opportunity. Without profit there
are no jobs, so matching people with duties that create
revenue overshadows the power of job descriptions that
historically screen out people with significant
disabilities. In essence CE demands that we focus on
economic development and job creation as the antidote to
reacting to the alleged demands of the fickle labor market.
This brief article addresses a few of the more common
concerns regarding CE, but many more questions exist. For
more information, please visit these websites:
www.customizedemployment.com ** www.employmentforall.org **
http://ruralinstitute.umt.edu/transition **
http://ruralinstitute.umt.edu/training ** www.onestops.info
** www.dol.gov/odep ** www.worksupport.com ** www.t-tap.org
** http://www.onestops.info/
References are
available by e-mailing Cary at cgriffin@griffinhammis.com
|
|
The Ed Roberts Postdoctoral Fellowship in Disability
Studies is accepting applications for three full-time,
nine-month, residential Ed Roberts Postdoctoral Fellowships
in 2006. The stipend is $30,000. The goal of this program is
to train postdoctoral and professional scholars, in any
discipline, to be leaders in disability studies and
rehabilitation research and mentorship. Based at the
University of California, Berkeley, a San Francisco Bay Area
Consortium of universities, research institutes, and
disability agencies will recruit people with advanced
professional degrees who want to broaden their theoretical
outlook and their disability research methodological skills.
Applications due February 15, 2006.
More Information...
Email Devva Kasnitz at devva@earthlink.net
|
|
A new scholarship in rehabilitation-related research is
available for full-time or part-time graduate students with
disabilities. Offered through the Toronto Rehabilitation
Institute, the scholarship is supported by TD Bank Financial
Group. The funding will provide scholarships of $20,000,
plus a supplement to help meet disability-related costs of
attending school. The first scholarships will cover
September 2006 to April 2007. Candidates must plan to be
enrolled in a graduate program leading to a master's or
doctoral degree at the University of Toronto. Fields of
study must be related to rehabilitation but are not limited
to any discipline. Application deadline: May 1, 2006
More
Information... E-mail ward.lois@torontorehab.on.ca
|
|
Eloquent Insights has announced a new article database on
disability awareness and education. They are inviting people
with disabilities to post original articles to this site as
“a great way to get exposure and enlighten others with your
own awareness message”. Articles can be submitted under a
variety of topic categories. If you want a place to publish
your disability-related writings, or if you want to read the
perspectives of others, this new site has a lot to offer.
Follow the link below & click on “Articles” at the top of
the page.
For more information... www.accessibleinsights.com
|
Are you interested in learning more about disability and
employment issues? Are you an employer? An educator? A
service provider? A job seeker with a disability? In our
store, DiversityShop, we carry over 20 of the best books and
videos that we have found on issues of disability and
employment. Check them out now!
See Diversity World's Employment & Disability
Resources...www.diversityshop.com
|
|
Is your organization holding an event that might be of
interest to our 3000+ readers? Would you like to add your
event to our listings?
To have your event listed, please see here...
|
|
March 20-25, 2006: Los Angeles, CA
“Technology and Persons with Disabilities”
This is a comprehensive, international conference, where
all technologies across all ages; disabilities; levels of
education and training; employment; and independent living
are addressed. It is the largest conference of its kind!
For more information... www.csun.edu/cod/conf/
|
|
San Diego, California: July 18-22, 2006
"Charting the Course for Change"
The annual international AHEAD conference brings together
professionals in the fields of higher education and
disability for a week of information-sharing, networking and
theoretical and practical training.
For more information... www.ahead.org/training/conference/index.htm
|
|
Would you like information or advice on a particular
issue related to disability & employment? Tie into our
network of over 3000 readers! Send us an email and we will
post your question in our next newsletter.
Send Us Your
Question... DNET@diversityworld.com
|
|
This Newsletter is published by Diversity World, 849 Almar
Avenue, Suite C, #206, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.
Archives of past issues are available on our website -
www.diversityworld.com
We also publish the "True Livelihood Newsletter" by
Denise Bissonnette. You can subscribe to this Newsletter
simply by clicking the "change profile" link below.
NOTE: This Newsletter is available in both plain text and
HTML formats. (HTML format has colorful pictures and
graphics.) To change your format, click on the "change
profile" link below.
Was this Newsletter forwarded to you? For your own free
subscription, click the "Subscribe" link below.
To subscribe:
click
here. |
|

(Return to Top)
|